DEATH THREAT, HISTORY CHANNEL CLAIMS I SAID I INVENTED AIDS, AND THE LIFTON MANIFESTO

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
DR. JAMES FEZTER GOT HIS VERY FIRST DEATH THREAT, EVER, AFTER DECIDING TO WRITE ABOUT AND INTERVIEW ME. HE THEN RECEIVED PERSONAL ATTACKS SUCH AS HE HAD RARELY EXPERIENCED. I THANK HIM FOR HIS COURAGE AND INTEGRITY. JVB-----------------

THE HISTORY CHANNEL SHOULD BE CALLED THE "REWRITING HISTORY" CHANNEL.
ACCORDING TO THEIR INTERNET FLICK ABOUT CONSPIRACY THEORISTS, I AM SOME KIND OF NUT JOB WHO CLAIMED TO HAVE INVENTED AIDS.
OF COURSE IT'S A LIE. BUT DID THE HISTORY CHANNEL DO SO MUCH AS SIMPLY CONSULT ME ABOUT THIS OUTRAGEOUS STATEMENT? DID THEY NOT CARE HOW MUCH TROUBLE THIS KIND OF LIE CAN CAUSE A PERSON TRYING TO LIVE PEACEABLY IN THE USA? THE ANSWER: NOT ONE BIT.
PEOPLE SHOULD NOT WONDER THAT I MUST LIVE IN EXILE.
WITHOUT HELP FROM OTHERS, I DO NOT KNOW WHAT WOULD BECOME OF ME, BUT I HAVE TRUST IN GOD, WHO SO FAR HAS PRESERVED MY LIFE, AND IN THE GOOD PEOPLE WHO LITERALLY KEEP ME GOING.

BUT MOST PEOPLE, AFTER ALL, WILL TEND TO BELIEVE THE HISTORY CHANNEL.
I HOPE THEY STOP BELIEVING.
WHY WOULD THE HISTORY CHANNEL SAY SUCH A TERRIBLE THING ABOUT ME, WITHOUT EVEN ASKING ME IF I'D EVER MADE SUCH AN OUTRAGEOUS CLAIM?
AND WHY DID REPORTER CHRIS ANDERSON PROMISE TO WRITE A BALANCED STORY ABOUT ME FOR MY HOME TOWN READERSHIP, WHICH TURNED INTO AN ATTACK PIECE WITH MANY FALSE REPORTS IN IT, INCLUDING A STATEMENT THAT I WAS SO SCARED TO SPEAK IN FRONT OF MY ENGLISH CLASS THAT I PEE'D MY PANTS? MY DAD HAD TO READ THAT ABOUT ME. MY LONGTIME FRIENDS.
MY FAMILY.
I AM ALSO THE SAME PERSON WHO IS REPORTED IN THAT SAME ARTICLE TO HAVE HAD A PART IN THE SOPHOMORE CLASS PLAY! YES, FOLKS, THAT WAS THE SAME GIRL, SUPPOSEDLY TOO SCARED TO TALK TO HER ENGLISH CLASS, BUT SHE'S ALSO IN THE SOPHOMORE PLAY (WHICH HAD ONLY FOUR ACTORS!). ANDERSON BLAMED HIS EDITOR FOR REMOVING THE 'NICE THINGS' AND LEAVING JUST THE 'BAD THINGS.' THE SARASOTA HERALD-TRIBUNE, AFTER GETTING LETTERS ABOUT WHAT FALSEHOODS THEY'D PUBLISHED (WET PANTIES NOT BEING THE ONLY ERROR) ALLOWED ME TO WRITE 500 WORDS OF CORRECTIONS. IT WAS PUBLISHED LOCALLY, BUT NEVER REACHED THE INTERNET, WHERE THE UNCORRECTED ARTICLE STILL ACCOSTS THE EYES OF THE WORLD.

HOW DID IT COME TO PASS THAT BOLD LIES AND WILD STORIES CAN BE PASSED AROUND ABOUT ME WITHOUT FEAR? IS IT BECAUSE I CANNOT SUE THESE PEOPLE, DUE TO ALL MY JOBS HAVING BEEN STRIPPED FROM ME? (TRY TO GET A JOB TEACHING WHEN YOU GET FINGERPRINTED FOUR TIMES BY THE AREA POLICE, WHO INFORM YOUR SCHOOL DISTRICT THAT THE FINGERPRINTING IS NECESSARY.)
PAST THE HARASSMENT, STORIES THAT I MUST BE BONKERS ALSO CIRCULATE. AFTER ALL, I 'CLAIM' TO HAVE INVENTED AIDS! (!!!) WHY IS IT IMPORTANT TO MAKE ME LOOK LIKE A NUT CASE? IS IT BECAUSE I MUST NOT BE BELIEVED, NO MATTER WHAT?
OF COURSE.
PART OF THE STRATEGY MAY BE INSPIRED BY WHAT RESEARCHERS CALL "THE LIFTON MANIFESTO.'

The so-called Lifton Manifesto was sent around in July 2003 to researchers for use any time a reporter might ask questions about me.
It was created in 2003 soon after it leaked out that THE HISTORY CHANNEL might air a documentary about me. The documentary, THE LOVE AFFAIR, Episode 8 in the Nigel Turner The Men Who Killed Kennedy series, was indeed aired in November. But THE LOVE AFFAIR was banned, along with its companion segments, soon after Lyndon Johnson supporters --and even two former Presidents-- voiced their outrage.
These people should have voiced their outrage that an honest investigation of the Kennedy murders and the MLK murder will never occur -- never reveal the whole truth--that our own US government's people from high to low places, assisted by inerested others, orchestrated these assassinations, and benefited from them, at the expense of the people.
I live in exile in Europe and Asia due to unmitigated and sporadic harrassment and threats. You should know who these bad people were, who overtook our counry, and who they have trained to take their places -- they, who were and are the assassinations' beneficiaries ---who took over our country from within, from the top down...think torture, wars, greedy banks, oil profits, selling America's soul, drugs,godlessness, violence and corruption--and remember JFK couldn't be bought off. He dared try to print our very own money for our very own country!

Now the dictators we think we actually elect (through rigged elecronic voting machines and paper ballots counted by machines!) heartlessly do their best to destroy JFK's reputation forever.
If people don't care about JFK anymore, maybe they won't listen to people like me, who tell you that your counry has been stolen from you. Overwork and the equivalent of slavery is next. Learn the lessons of history: when was the last time you felt SECURE in your job? One illness can destroy you forever.
People such as me are weak and small, just insignificant, tiny roadblocks to the rewriting of history that's going on--a rewriting that hides what happened.
I am one of the few left to warn you, to wake you up.

Thus the History Channel will dare say I claim to have invented AIDS, knowing I do not dare go to the US to sue them for libel.
I am sure I wouldn't last long. All those 'accidents' I've already had in the US that put me into the hospital taught me a lesson.
They want me to shut up.
They want you to believe I'm some kind of nut.
Why else publicize me as having claimed to have invented AIDS?
God forgive them. I'm trying to.

A panel of hastily-assembled historians pronounced anathema on one of the TMWKK segments, THE GUILTY MEN -- about Vice President Lyndon Johnson knowing JFK would be killed and allowing it to happen -- saying it was all a fabrication.
BUT THEY NEVER INTERVIEWED ANY OF THE WITNESSES, INCLUDING ME.
The 'panel of historians' functioned as a cover-up, to have an 'official' answer as to why the 3 segments were banned. Even though 50,000 orders for copies of the documentaries were immediately sold, all orders not yet shipped were canceled.

Now that's power.

Not satisfied with censorship, people made sure producer/writer Nigel Turner was demonized on the Internet. He has vanished from public view. His longtime TMWKK series has vanished from the History Channel. In its place are nasty anti-Kennedy documentaries teaching the American people to despise our slain president. Kids are growing up thinking JFK was just a drug-stupored womanizer, with little mention of his heroism. THEY NEED TO READ JAMES DOUGLASS' BOOK JFK AND THE UNSPEAKABLE. THEY NEED TO READ ED HASLAM'S DR. MARY'S MONKEY. THEY NEED TO READ DOUG HORNE'S BOOKS ON THE ARRB. THEY NEED TO READ MY BOOK, ME & LEE, WHICH IS BEING RELEASED THIS SUMMER.

Turner is apparently in hiding. But I doubt he'll be in hiding forever. He's too gutsy. Too honest.
As for me, I eventually had to live in exile.
On November 20, 2003, Nigel Turner sent me an email of encouragement. My emails to others were being blocked and he was concerned. He at that time had no idea that his series would become banned. One part of his email stated, "The Love Affair will air for many years to come when the tittle tattle of your beloved web sites is long forgotten. I think you get the picture." Yes, they were supposed to be aired several times a year --until 2013!

NOW, YOU MUST GO TO YOUTUBE TO SEE THEM (IGNORE THE NASTY COMMENTS WRITTEN ABOUT ME BY PEOPLE, WHEN LOOKED UP, ARE OLD, FAMILIAR ENEMIES..SOMETIMES THE SAME PERSON USES SEVERAL DIFFERENT NAMES).

Interestingly, Rachel Oswald Porter, Lee Oswald's daughter, had sent an email to me expressing her disdain of David Lifton right after THE LOVE AFFAIR aired. She had some bad dealings with him. So have I.
Here's her email: (RESEARCHER WIM DANKBAAR LATER CONTACTED HER AND HER HUSBAND...HER FULL NAME, ADDRESS, ETC.IS WITHHELD FOR THE SAKE OF HER PRIVACY)
Tuesday November 18, 2003 7:47

Hello,
My name is Rachel Oswald. I was born 10/20/1963. I just saw your
interview on the History Channel. After 40 years of unwanted
attention, I want to thank you for placing the light on yourself and
not my poor mother who becomes distraught every November at this time.
I wanted to tell you that either you are a victim of too much
knowledge and are delusional or you are telling your truth about what
you believed happened to you in 1963.
Personally, I just wanted to know what you can tell me about my
father.
Sincerely,
Rachel Oswald Porter
P.S. I cannot stand David Lifton and believe he would sell his mother
if the price were right. Your thoughts?

I WROTE HER A LONG LETER TELLING HER ABOUT HER COURAGEOUS FATHER, WHO LOVED HER SO VERY MUCH.

Rachel and I both have good reasons not to like Mr. Lifton.

In July, 2003, 4 months before THE LOVE AFFAIR aired, Lifton sent around "the Lifton Manifesto" instructing researchers how to handle the "Judyth Vary Baker" problem.
(hint: his biography on Lee Oswald [once titled "Charade"] had to be put on hold and has yet to see publication, since Lifton had not discovered my relationship with Lee -- so much for his research abilities--- and he apparently deemed it better for him to discredit me rather than to spend time rewriting his book. His book remains unpublished, though he and Debra Conway, who runs the for-profit organization Lancer, had worked on it together for years prior to my speaking out.)
If I could be discredited, Lifton could then publish his book without rewriting it. Editors had already seen it and it was being advertised for pre-sales when it was withdrawn from advertisements.

HERE IS THE DAVID LIFTON MANIFESTO, which has been used against me ever since:from David Lifton e-mail, July 19, 2003:
"ADVICE FOR ANYONE CONTACTED BY A REPORTER. . .

"* Ask: what pieces of evidence or narrative history impress you?
Inform them that most are not original with Judyth ; tell them where they have previously been published and what's wrong with them.
Explain existence of publicly available chronologies, and how Judyth "inserts" herself.

"* She's a loony. Provide phone numbers of people who have dealt with her and know that.

"(Don't argue that her evidence and narrative are wrong *because* she is a loony. That is the ad hominem fallacy. But pointing out that she is in fact a loony is not.

"Regarding Shackelford: Point out his relationship with Harrison Livingstone, and the $ 100 million lawsuit he filed accusing fellow researcher of murder conspiracy; and multi-year co-dependent relationship he has had with Judyth. (Refer to contact at 60 minutes for how Shackelford was pushing this phony story, etc.)"

So what does this do to the witness? It means that on Feb. 28, 2010, when Dr. James Fetzer brought up this topic: "YouTube: Judyth Vary Baker: Living in Exile" I was immediately accused of being a mental case by Jack White, who was influenced on a newsgroup forum.

HERE'S WHERE THE THREAD STARTED:

http://www.youtube.com/user/JamesFetzerNews

Judyth Vary Baker, with whom I and others within the JFK community are in contact, lives in exile due to persecution in the US because of what she knows as a witness concerning Lee Harvey Oswald. The covert operation against Judyth is very serious and takes its toll upon her. She is now 66 [67] years of age and has been forced to live in exile in Europe, where she resides in virtual poverty, even though she is a talented artist who has sold her paintings around the world for more than thirty years. The objective of this campaign appears to be to minimize awareness of her existence as a link to the alleged assassin.

My Blog: Judyth Vary Baker: Living in Exile
http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2010...-in-exile.html

THE SAME DAY, WHITE POSTED THIS:
Judyth suffers from Factitious Disorder.
This post has been edited by Jack White: Mar 1 2010, 12:38 AM

An hour later, he added:

QUOTE (Jack White @ Feb 28 2010, 01:42 AM)
Judyth suffers from Munchausen's syndome.

"FACTITIOUS DISORDER, (of which MUNCHAUSEN SYNDROME is a sub-type), (also called "Adult Munchausen", and "Adult Factitious Disorder") is a formal, DSM-IV mental health diagnosis in which people deliberately exaggerate and/or fabricate and/or induce physical and/or psychological-behavioral-mental health problems in themselves. The primary purpose of this behavior is to gain some form of internal gratification, such as attention, for themselves."

These comments, though supposedly illegal on the Educaton Forum, were allowed to remain.

I sent Dr. Fetzer confidential copies of my psychological evaluations, including my having passed the MMPI II, an IQ test, neuropyschological tests and results, and a letter from my clinical psychologist asserting I was not prone to story-telling or fantasies and was not an attention-seeker.
The evaluations were performed because I suffered short term memory problems after having been deliberately struck by a white van, which event sent me to the hospital with a concussion. The conclusion was that I had sustained short-term memory damage, but that I had no psychological problems beyond some normal feelings of anxiety over my inability to walk well, see well (double vision),etc. Nevertheless, the Lifton Manifesto suggests this mode of attack --"says she's looney" as a prime strategy with reporters, as well as on the Internet.

"You can't fight the Kremlin," Lee used to say.
How true.
But at least, I can tell all of you what these people have tried to do.

I hope you'll read my book and decide for yourself.

For those who say I've added too many personal details to the book, I decided to do it after great thought and personal discomfort. Nobody normally portrays very personal aspects of one's sex life, as I had to do in this biography. But it was necessary because of another 'biography' about Lee, called Marina and Lee (written to make him look like a troubled, insecure, immature, even insipid man with poor sexual abilities). I was determined to show the man as he really was, even if it meant I would suffer some humiliation by doing so.

While there are a few things I haven't mentioned, you can count on this book to give you the full truth about the real Lee H. Oswald, and why a police officer in New Orleans, officer Martello, after interrogating Lee, actually told the warren Commission he would bet his "head on a chopping block" that Lee Oswald did not kill the President.

AND IN THE END, THIS BOOK WILL PREVAIL.
PEOPLE'S HEARTS WILL BE TOUCHED, BECAUSE THE TRUTH WILL REACH THEM.
NO "MANIFESTO" WILL BE ABLE TO STOP IT.
AS EDWARD HASLAM SAID, THEY TRIED TO TERRIFY ME INTO SILENCE, AND SUCCEEDED FOR A LONG TIME. BUT IN THE END, I HAD TO SPEAK OUT.
AND IN THE END, OUR LOVE STORY WILL TEAR APART ALL THOSE LIES ABOUT LEE OUT THERE. PEOPLE WILL KNOW HE COULD NEVER HAVE KILLED KENNEDY.
THEN THEY WILL KNOW WHO DID.
LEE WLL BE VINDICATED.

AND VINDICATING LEE OSWALD MEANS YOU MUST LOOK AT WHO KILLED KENNEDY AND HIS BROTHER--AND MARTIN LUTHER KING.
IT ISN'T NICE, BUT IT'S ESSENTIAL, TO KNOW THAT OUR GOVERNMENT PARTICIPATED IN THE PLOTS AT MANY LEVELS.

TO GET OUR COUNTRY BACK, WE MUST START AT THE BOTTOM AND INSTALL NEW BLOOD, CLEAN BLOOD, UNCORRUPTED BLOOD, THEN WORK OUR WAY UPWARDS. IT CANNOT BE DONE TOP-DOWN. THEY TAKE THE PRESIDENTS TO THE WOODSHED.

TO GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK, HELP ME AND OTHERS WHO HAVE STUCK OUR NECKS OUT TO KEEP THE TRUTH OUT THERE. PLEASE VISIT HTTP://WWW.JUDYTHVARYBAKER.COM FOR MORE INFORMATION, AND TO HELP ME, IF YOU ARE SO INSPIRED.

I'D LIKE TO ADD THAT I WAS STUNNED AND PLEASED TO LEARN THAT A FACEBOOK CAUSE NOW EXISTS -- "VINDICATION FOR JUDYTH VARY BAKER AND LEE HARVEY OSWALD." THANK YOU, SO MUCH, THOSE OF YOU WHO HAVE JOINED THE CAUSE! THERE'S MUCH TO BE DONE! GET THE BOOKS I'VE MENTIONED OUT TO AS MANY PEOPLE AS YOU CAN, SO THEY'LL HAVE THE TRUTH IN THEIR HANDS, BOUGHT WITH THE BLOOD AND TEARS OF MANY WITNESSES, NOT JUST MINE.

GOD BLESS AMERICA,and those who love our country.

Judyth Vary Baker

Judyth Vary Baker: Living in Exile

---------------------------------------------------------------------

TO SEE PHOTOS AND THE DEATH THREAT THAT ACCOMPANIED DR. FETZER'S BLOG,
PLEASE VISIT :

http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2010/02/judyth-vary-baker-living-in-exile.html

james fetzer
Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths

Thursday, February 25, 2010
Judyth Vary Baker: Living in Exile

Judyth Vary Baker, with whom I and others within the JFK community are in contact, has sent Google an email about the outrageous actions to which she has been subjected. A rather substantial number of references to her have been disappearing from the Internet since the History Channel broadcast a documentary, "The Love Affair", about her relationship with Lee Harvey Oswald. Originally shown in 2003, it would be banned along with two other segments, "The Smoking Guns" and "The Guilty Men".


My webmaster, Lola Heavey, like many others, has archived that segment as part of the complete 9-part video documentary series, "The Men Who Killed Kennedy". "The Love Affair" focuses on revealing interviews with Judyth, who was at the time a cancer-research specialist in New Orleans who was also having an extramarital affair with Lee prior to the assassination of JFK. Judyth has substantiated aspects of her story with official records that she worked with Oswald, and others, on a classified project.



"The Men Who Killed Kennedy: The Love Affair"


Anyone who does a Google search for "Judyth Vary Baker" will realize that very little information about her is available on the internet. That was not always the case. Thousands of references have been removed in what appears to be a systematic effort to nullify her as an historical personality. Not even her Wikipedia page has been left standing.


It has the features of a cyber war. Positive posts by her supporters have been erased, while negative ones, especially highly denigrating ones--such as those by David Von Pein, which are particularly nasty--have been left intact.


This covert operation against Judyth is very serious and takes its toll upon her. She is now 66 years of age and has been forced to live in exile in Europe, where she resides in virtual poverty, even though she is a talented artist who has sold her paintings around the world for more than thirty years. The objective of this campaign appears to be to minimize awareness of her existence as a link to the alleged assassin.


If anybody has doubts on what Google can do with its search facilities, they should read NufffRespect Blog. NufffRespect, who runs a YouTube channel with 73,429 subscribers, has explained that significant censorship is taking place in relation to YouTube. Indeed, the evidence strongly suggests that YouTube, which is a branch of Google, is deliberately stopping the counters at 300 views to control information about which videos are most popular and which are not.


How does YouTube know which videos should be suppressed when there are so many uploaded every minute? According to NufffRespect, all the processing is carried out automatically by algorithms that search through video titles, descriptions, and tags to find specific keywords YouTube deems to be "controversial". And a search can also be conducted through the audio of videos themselves in order to screen for controversial subjects.


Based upon my interactions with Judyth, I and several others within the JFK research community, including Jim Marrs, the author of CROSSFIRE (1989), one of the bases of Oliver Stone's "JFK", have become convinced that she is "the real deal". In protest of this form of abuse, which clearly violates the principles of freedom of speech and of freedom of the press, Judyth has sent an email to Google under the heading, "REFERENCES BEING ERASED AGAIN".


To Whom It May Concern:

References to me have been constantly disappearing on the Internet ever since the History Channel ran a documentary on me that was eventually banned due to pressure by special interests.

Last year, 15,000 references, which direct people to my books, paintings and writings, were erased.

Over 250,000 newsgroup references were also erased.

Then my Wikipedia biography, which had been in Wikipedia over five years, was erased. One reason given was that I only had 1,700 references on google ([where] 48,000 had been erased overnight).

I was told by one person that the erasure was accomplished by a group with Usenet who had also erased over 250,000 newsgroup posts that I and my supporters had made after spurious and unfair attacks were made against me by these newsgroups, leaving mostly their pejorative and nasty posts about me. The 'nice' ones vanished.

It is interesting to see that, in these newsgroups, there is nothing about me there between 2009 and 2004: all that was in between was removed. Between 2004-2009, we established that I was a witness who was telling the truth. Now all that is left is that I am a witness who has been telling lies that "have not been answered." This was not the case.

Nevertheless, as people learned about my book and my status as a controversial witness, the number of references shot up this year again, on the Internet search, to 24,000 for "Judyth Vary Baker."

Then, the day before yesterday, 20,000 references to "Judyth Vary Baker" vanished from the Internet.

Today, with about 3,300 remaining, another 50 vanished. I have seen this pattern before. Every day, about 50-100 references will vanish. Only writing to you has been able to restore the references.

Understand that there were over 45,000 references three years ago.

Generally, a group from Marquette University has actively been deleting all references to me on newsgroups: one member was on the board of Usenet before Google took over DejaVu....He has set up several large websites against me, as my witness statements have gone against what he teaches at his university. His websites include many false statements about me that he has refused to correct.

I have had no ability to save all the "good" references to me, once again...

I am asking that they be restored. We're talking about some 21,000 references that are no longer available when people search for "Judyth Vary Baker."

I am a witness who now has to live overseas due to persecution in the US. At age 66, this is not my desire.

Google, please restore my livelihood, as the loss of the sites on the search engine make it hard for people to find me unless they already know my name.

NOTE: I AM BLIND ccING A NUMBER OF PEOPLE CONCERNING THIS PROBLEM. I WILL SEND ALL OF THEM YOUR RESPONSE.

Thank you.


Judyth has also written to my webmaster, Lola, and has given me permission to publish the email here.


Dear Lola:

In 2003, a controversial 3-part addition to the History Channel's popular "The Men Who Killed Kennedy" series--episodes 7, 8 and 9--was banned after strident objections by LBJ's widow, Disney executives, Jack Valenti, and others. A board of historians whose writings were favorable to Lyndon Johnson was hastily assembled to discredit the veracity of the episodes, though none of the witnesses, including myself, were ever interviewed. It was a hatchet job.

Over 300,000 references using my name, by this time, were on the Internet. I had also published poetry, was a professional artist, had published short stories and writings, and had participated in newsgroups explaining in great detail what I knew as a witness concerning Lee Harvey Oswald.

I was shocked and concerned when I was misquoted and mocked; furthermore, I found my posts were being misquoted, out of context. "Witnesses" who had never met me or scarcely knew me came out of the woodwork, saying I was a poor teacher. I and my friends defended me on the Internet. One important website "crashed" and "lost" hundreds of posts and supporting statements. When it was restored, all the posts but mine had been saved. The webmaster said I was "paranoid" to think it was personal.

Between 2003 and 2008, over 400,000 references to my name and my history, good and bad, existed in newsgroups and the Internet. Though many were attack sites, the truth was "out there."

Then a newsgroup that had collected about a hundred of my posts suddenly erased them all. A webmaster of some very large websites that attacked me personally on the Internet was also the moderator of an important newsgroup.

In 2008, this moderator erased 250,000 newsgroup references to my name. A gap between 2009 and 2004 exists. At the same time, the most damning posts were kept online, as if they had never been answered with defenses.

The labor of years had been erased over a period of about two months.

By 2008, the number of references on the Internet itself had risen to some 30,000.

My biography on Wikipedia had been created by the hostile moderator of the newsgroup previously mentioned, but because I had many friends, some were editors who added ameliorating comments, references and statements to balance the Wikipedia biography.

Visitors to the Wikipedia biography saw references to online resources that supported conspiracy theories, even though some references also mentioned hostile attack sites against me.

Throughout this time period, I had been harrassed, threatened, robbed, burglarized, hit on the head, had my car's brake lines severed, and had been forced twice overseas for my safety.

My family suffered, too. Nevertheless, the Wikipedia biography at least provided somewhat of a balanced assessment of who I was and what I stood for.

Due to death threats, in 2007 I had to leave my teaching position in Hungary. I entered the EU political asylum program. As an American, this was a desperate measure: I was an ordinary American, not someone trying to find refuge as a soldier escaping war in iraq, for example. In fact, I was the first woman in decades to enter the system seeking protection.

They were going to deport me at once to the US, but after investigating the situation, and finding threats to have me arrested, and my name linked viciously to the Taliban shortly after 9/11, they did more investigating.

I was not deported. Though I was told it was impossible to "keep" me permanently, since the US is the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave, I could stay as long as it took for my family to find safe places for me.

At great sacrifice (my son even gave up his very nice apartment and moved into a single room), my parents, sister, and two of my children, were able to arrange safe accommodations. But it took all of our resources. I consequently live in poverty.

The newsgroup mocked me for the fact that I was "turned down" for political asylum. I was not turned down. I was granted protection as long as the system dared to keep me on--for over ten months I was housed, fed and given medical care, until I could get to safety on my own. There was never a chance that I could get permanent status as a political asylum refugee, since I was
a non-combatant form the USA.

Now living overseas in exile--the third time, due to death threats; and I have not gone into detail as to all that has happened to me, by any means--my swedish friend Allan Mattsson had been doing some editorial work for Wikipedia, and I told him about the highly biased anti-Oswald Wikipedia biography on Oswald. He isn't that good in English writing, so I worked with him, and we added a few statements--all of them true--such as the fact that Oswald received his GED, because the Wikipedia biography only mentioned that he was a high school dropout.

It was immediately erased. We added a statement that the Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB) had been formed--never mentioned in the biography of Oswald--that collected evidence and testimonies.

This, too, was erased.

Then came a flood of complaints against my Wikipedia biography, as my identity was linked to Allan Mattsson's through my email account. This special email account serves as an interface between me and hackers, etc. to protect my own computer.

The next thing I knew, the Wikipedia biography--after five years online--was slated for elimination as the biography of a non-existing person as a hoax biography!

Then, suddenly, the google search engine revealed that instead of some 40,000 references on the Internet (not newsgroups), there were now only some 1,700 left.

At the same time, Wikipedia editors decided to erase my biography, claiming that I did not exist. After I proved that I existed, by then the number of references to me had dropped to some 1,300 online. Now they stated that I was not important enough to be included in a biography, as all I had was a "claim" that John McAdams said was phony. I was a 'one-note' person whose art, writings, poetry, etc. was not world class (though I've sold my paintings worldwide for thirty years) and that, furthermore, McAdams assured them that my "claims" were fictitious.

Friends tried to protest, but in mid-2009, their Wikipedia biography, with its references to more online resouces about Lee Oswald than any other online source, was erased. Away went mention of Fetzer, Groden, Livingstone, Haslam, the Men Who Killed Kennedy series, the banned History Channel documentary links, other documentary links where I appeared in their films on TV, or in magazines from sea to shining sea, and overseas.

The many protests that were lodged were supposed to be kept in an archive, but they, too, vanished (I did save some of them). I later discovered that this removal was led by "Shutterbun 2" who posts on the McAdams newsgroup that ended up erasing over 250,000 references there.

CNN late in 2009 noted that Michelle Obama's picture as a female gorilla had somehow gone to the top in search engine photos. I knew such was no "accident" after what had gone to the top about me. However, after the CNN report, suddenly 18,000 references to me popped up again.

These were in place until one of my friends, Marha Rose Crow, who collects evidence of ponerology--evil in government affairs--and archives them online in her blogs, made what I consider the error of adding my website to her sidebar.

Before long, Martha's 105 blogs got erased. They were restored, but the 22,500 references I had, some helped along by Martha's blogs, vanished. I am now represented by only 3,200 references. As for Martha, though most of her blogs were restored, some 35,000 of her references vanished.

Therefore, I wrote Google security about the problem.

And I responded, as well, to your kind inquiry.

Please fix any typos, as I have double vision and desperately need new glasses. Though I will never stop fighting for Lee Oswald's exoneration, to see the labors of a decade erased not once but several times, in every possible way, does bring tears to my eyes.

I have lost my home, employment, my health, my reputation and family members who are ashamed of me for speaking out. At nearly 67, my grandchildren have forgotten me. I yearn for books in English. I'd love to have some nice warm socks, as I live in one of the coldest places in one of the coldest countries half the time. The other half of the time, for my protection, I dress in a burka and live in Turkey. You could make a movie out of all that's happened.

What's important is that Lee Harvey Oswald's exoneration means that the US government carried out a coup d'etat. If we want our country back, we need to remove all questions about, "Did Oswald do it?"

He tried to save the president, as I dare to testify anytime, any place.

God bless America. Truth alone will get us back on our feet. Destroying witnesses and all mention of them on the Internet--these dirty tricks are not going to stop me as long as I have breath left in my body and people of good will pay attention.

Judyth Vary Baker

http://www.judythvarybaker.com



Those who doubt the truth of Judyth's words about the innocence of Lee and the occurrence of a coup d'etat need to learn more about the death of JFK. Beyond the blogs found here, the books I have edited and the articles I have published about the assassination, I have interviewed many experts on my own radio program, which are archived at radiofetzer.blogspot.com.


Two of those are of special interest here, both with Doug Horne, the author of INSIDE THE ARRB (2009), who was its former Senior Analyst for Military Affairs. One focuses on the recreation of the Zapruder film to create a false record of the sequence of events in Dealey Plaza, the other about the medical cover-up in excruciating detail.


John McAdams, by the way, is a notorious "lone-nutter" who supports the official account of the assassination, which is refutable on elementary grounds. (See, for example, "Reasoning about Assassinations", which I presented at Cambridge and published in a peer-reviewed journal.)


Dave von Pein, moreover, is an especially vicious attack dog who goes after anyone who contests the governments position, as anyone can readily verify by tracing the comments for INSIDE THE ARRB, where he has gone after Doug Horne tooth and claw and I have rebutted many of his assaults, which will continue.


Not the least of my reasons for posting this blog is that I received a death threat today for my work on JFK and 9/11. Lola, however, suspects that it is directly related to my support for Judyth, where she may well be right. She has done a nice piece of detective work in identifying the person she suspects sent this threat to me, which I received just this morning. Here is the threat and the identity of the person who may well have sent it. He seems to fit.


Click for the complete threat:

Click for the likely suspect:


Posted by Jim Fetzer at 6:04 PM